NEWS

Delhi Court Sends CM Arvind Kejriwal To 14-Day Judicial Custody In Excise Policy Case

In a corruption case involving the alleged excise scam, the CBI on Saturday requested 14 days of judicial custody of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, stating that his detention was required in the “interest of the investigation and justice.”

Read More: Central govt employees, pensioners alert! CGHS Card rules revised – Check new rates, eligibility

Delhi’s Rouse Avenue court on Saturday sent Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal to judicial custody till July 12th in a CBI case related to an excise policy matter. The CBI on Saturday sought 14 days judicial custody of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in a corruption case involving the alleged excise scam, claiming that his detention was necessary in the “interest of the investigation and justice.” 

Read More: Delhi Traffic Advisory For Commissionerate Day Parade Issued; Check Diversions, Routes To Avoid

During the hearing, vacation judge Sunena Sharma stated that once the police remand expires, the court has no choice but to send the accused to judicial custody. The court’s detailed order is awaited. On June 26, Rouse Avenue Court ordered CM Kejriwal to be held in CBI custody for three days following the agency’s application to detain the Aam Aadmi Party supremo for interrogation.

Earlier that day, CM Kejriwal was formally arrested by the CBI and appeared before vacation judge Amitabh Rawat. The CBI was granted permission to bring CM Kejriwal before the special court after he was questioned by the central agency in Tihar Jail earlier this week.

Read More: Maharashtra govt announces pilgrimage scheme for senior citizens from all religions

According to the CBI’s remand application, Kejriwal refused to cooperate with the investigation and deliberately gave evasive answers contrary to the evidence on record. The CBI arrested Kejriwal in connection with the government’s excise policy irregularities.

The ED arrested him on March 21 in connection with a money laundering case involving the now-scrapped policy. He was granted bail by a trial court, but the Delhi High Court stayed it.

Source :
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Most Popular

To Top