Rijiju termed the collegium system of appointing judges “opaque”, “alien to the Constitution”
Union minister Kiren Rijiju has been divested of the law and justice portfolio and assigned that of the earth sciences ministry, Rashtrapati Bhavan said in a communique on Thursday. Arjun Ram Meghwal has been assigned the independent charge as minister of state in the ministry of law and justice in addition to his existing portfolios in place of Rijiju.
Read More: Indian Railways To Launch Mumbai-Goa Vande Bharat Express Soon, Trial Run Begins
Meghwal, who is from Rajasthan, is also of minister of state for parliamentary affairs and culture.
Rijiju took an openly confrontational approach towards the judiciary. He repeatedly termed the collegium system of appointing judges “opaque”, “alien to the Constitution” and the “only system in the world where judges appoint people known to them”.
He maintained there was no confrontation between the judiciary and the executive but also emphasised that judges cannot be appointed through judicial orders and that it has to be done by the government. Indeed, he stressed that judicial appointment is not a function of the judiciary and that its primary role is to decide cases.
While his utterances received wide coverage, it is not clear whether they served any material purpose. To be sure, it is not known whether his approach had anything to do with the change in his portfolio.
Interestingly, the apex court and the Chief Justice of India have refused to be drawn into the debate.
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a plea demanding action against Vice President Jagdeep Dhankhar and Rijiju for their contentious remarks on the judiciary and the collegium system.
The apex court was hearing an appeal filed by the Bombay Lawyers Association (BLA) against a Bombay high court order. In its plea before the high court, the lawyers’ body alleged that Rijiju and Dhankhar disqualified themselves to hold the constitutional posts by showing a lack of faith in the Constitution through their conduct and utterances made in public against the Supreme Court and the collegium.
Read More: Air India Delhi-Sydney Flight Hit by Severe Turbulence, Several Passengers Injured
The Association referred to a raft of statements made by Rijiju and Dhankhar over the last year, marking an ongoing confrontation between the executive and the judiciary over the judges’ selection mechanism and the division of powers between the two.
Dhankhar has also questioned the collegium system. The top court responded with reminders to the government that the collegium system is the law of the land that must be followed by the government “to a T”.