The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recently modified the rules governing bank lockers with effect from January 1, 2022
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recently modified the rules governing bank lockers with effect from January 1, 2022. One of the major changes is increasing the rental of lockers. The second change requiring fresh paperwork to be completed on stamp paper and submitted ahead of the year end banking holidays (due date Jan 1, 2023). This change has caught most lockers holders by surprise as the notice from some banks came through SMS barely 15 to 20 days before the deadline while some other banks sent it as late as December 30, 2022 expecting consumer compliance by Jan 1, 2023. For those traveling or out of location of the bank locker or those residing outside the country i.e. Non Resident Indians, the bank notification was a shock as there was no way for them to comply with the needful.
Read More: UK announces cash support for low-income households
The revised central bank instruction had stated that “Banks shall ensure that any unfair terms or conditions are not incorporated in their locker agreements. Further, the terms of the contract shall not be more onerous than required in ordinary course of business to safeguard the interests of the bank. Banks shall renew their locker agreements with existing locker customers by January 1, 2023.” However, the last minute mobile message appears to have caught most bank locker holders by surprise, going by the consumer complaints on LocalCircles platform.
Bank Lockers have long been considered a safe haven to keep emergency cash, valuable ornaments or property papers, and in times of need a reliable source to borrow from.
On the issue of bank locker charges, which vary according to the size, the district or city you live in and also the bank of your choice, LocalCircles in a survey sought asked consumers “How do you or your family plan to cope up with the increased charges?”. The survey responses show that 6 out of 10 respondents feel the need to either change the bank or downsize the locker they have rented. Of the 9,381 respondents to the question, 14% indicated plans to give up the locker due to charges which have shot up 100-300% depending on the bank, 31% are proposing to shift to a bank charging less rent for lockers, 14% are planning to rent a smaller locker, while 2% were as yet undecided while 39% respondents have no plans to change their lockers. Feedback from consumers in community discussions also indicates that in the last one year many customers have already reduced or stopped use of a bank locker.
Read More: Government may modify capital gains tax rules in upcoming budget: Report
The survey asked respondents, “Do you believe whether the banking system has become more complex or expensive or both complex and expensive in the last five years?”. Of 11,984 respondents, 52% felt that the banking system has become both complex and expensive, 4% felt banking services has become complex while 13 % felt the system is not complex but is now more expensive. On the other hand, 19% respondents felt the system was now simpler and inexpensive, 9% respondents stated that there has been no change while 3% were undecided. Altogether 78% respondents felt the system has become either expensive, complex or both. Once again, the community feedback received so far on the latest compliance requirement for bank lockers clearly indicates that people are just not happy with the way banks have handled it.
“In summary, the latest change in rules for holding a bank locker and the way banks have implemented it, is expected to further reinforce the growing public perception that banking services has become more complex and expensive. In the case of bank lockers for instance, the steep increase in rental is making 6 out of 10 survey respondents rethink on whether to maintain the facility or to take a smaller vault or switch the bank. The decline in consumer faith in banking services like lockers doesn’t speak well of the efforts to woo more people into the formal financial network be it through savings or borrowing,” the report explained.
