During the hearing, senior advocate Devadatt Kamat, appearing for the petitioner, submitted before Karnataka HC that the Government Order (ban on hijab) is a non-application of mind. He said this ”GO (government order) is in the teeth of Article 25 and it is not legally sustainable.” Kamal also said that Muslim women are allowed to wear headscarves in Kendriya Vidyalaya. He added that ”this is a case where students have been wearing a headscarf for years together.”
Bengaluru: Amid the ongoing Hijab controversy, the Karnataka High Court on Monday adjourned the matter for Tuesday after concluding the hearing on the petitions challenging the ban on Hijab in schools and colleges. Ahead of the hearing, the Karnataka High Court also appealed to the media “to be more responsible.”
Senior advocate Devadatt Kamat, appearing for the petitioner, submitted before Karnataka HC that the Government Order (ban on hijab) is a non-application of mind. He said this ”GO (government order) is in the teeth of Article 25 and it is not legally sustainable.” Kamal also said that Muslim women are allowed to wear headscarves in Kendriya Vidyalaya. He added that ”this is a case where students have been wearing a headscarf for years together.”
Driving his point home, Kamat said as far as core religious practices are concerned, they come from Article 25(1) & that it is not absolute. Advocate Kamat added “if core religious practices harm or offend public order then it can be regulated.” Kamat maintained, “The question is where is that law on the basis of which the headscarf is prohibited.”
To which, the Karnataka High Court asked Kamat whether what all has been stated in Quran is essential religious practice? Replying to it, Kamat said, “I am not saying that.”
The petitioners argue that according to Quran, it is a ‘farz’ (duty) to wear hijab. Students are seeking to wear hijabs of the same colour as their uniforms. The petitioners have urged the court to allow girls to attend classes in hijab and continue their education while the government argued that it would be necessary to find whether the hijab is essential in Islam.
Meanwhile, High schools in Karnataka reopened on Monday after being shut from last Wednesday following untoward incidents in parts of the State over the hijab row. Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code has been imposed in sensitive areas in the districts of Udupi and Dakshina Kannada, and Bengaluru.
Chief Minister Basavaraj Bommai on Sunday expressed confidence that peace and normalcy will prevail. He had also said that a decision regarding the reopening of Pre-University and Degree colleges will be taken after assessing the situation.
The government on Friday said that the holiday announced to universities belonging to the Department of Higher Education and colleges under the Department of Collegiate and Technical Education (DCTE), in the wake of the raging Hijab row, has been extended till February 16.
In the Udupi district, high schools reopened on Monday with Education Department sources saying that attendance was normal in all the institutions. Muslim girl students who reached the school campuses wearing hijabs, removed them before entering classes.
Examinations scheduled for the day are also going on in the institutions. Police personnel have been posted in Udupi town and near the schools to maintain law and order and to avoid any untoward incident.
The Udupi district administration has imposed Section 144 of CrPC around 200-metre radius of all high schools in the district from Monday till February 19 to maintain peace. Udupi Tahsildar Pradeep Kurudekar, who visited a few schools, said Muslim students are abiding by the High Court’s interim order by removing hijabs before entering classes.
Meanwhile, in a statement, Udupi Pejawar mutt chief Swami Vishwaprasanna Teertha appealed to all sections to avoid chaos and maintain peace.
